CrossFitters vs OCR Racers: Who Really Has the Edge in HYROX and DEKA?

There’s a quiet rivalry heating up on start lines around the world — not between individuals, but between training backgrounds. As HYROX and Spartan DEKA continue their rapid rise and draw athletes from every corner of the fitness world, two groups show up again and again near the front: the CrossFit crowd and the OCR (Obstacle Course Racing) crew.
Both are fit. Both are resilient. Both are used to pushing through discomfort. But they’re built through very different training styles, which leads to a big and very debatable question:
Which background actually sets you up for the best experience — and the best results — in HYROX or DEKA?
What Makes HYROX and DEKA Their Own Beasts
HYROX and Spartan DEKA both sit in a unique middle ground between strength sport and endurance racing. While their formats differ, they share a common DNA: running (or engine work) mixed with standardized functional training challenges.
HYROX follows a consistent race structure:
-
8 × 1 km runs
-
After each run, one workout station, including:
-
SkiErg
-
Sled push
-
Sled pull
-
Burpee broad jumps
-
Rowing
-
Farmers carry
-
Sandbag lunges
-
Wall Balls
-
DEKA uses a 10-zone format built around functional fitness challenges like:
-
Lunges
-
Box step-overs
-
Rowing
-
SkiErg
-
Dead ball movements
-
Farmers carries
Instead of long outdoor runs, DEKA uses shorter running segments or mixed “engine” efforts between zones, depending on the format (DEKA FIT, DEKA STRONG, or DEKA MILE).
Both formats expose poor pacing, weak strength endurance, and inefficient movement. It’s not just about being strong or just about having cardio — it’s about how well those qualities work together over time.
CrossFitters: Built for the Work Zones
Athletes from a CrossFit-style background often feel right at home stepping into HYROX or DEKA events. Many of the movements are familiar, and the sensation of working hard while breathing heavily is nothing new.
CrossFit training tends to build:
-
Comfort with mixed-modality workouts
-
The ability to produce power under fatigue
-
Confidence moving quickly between different stations
That combination can translate into strong performances on strength-focused elements like sled pushes, wall balls, and rowing. CrossFitters are also used to transitioning quickly between movements without needing long recovery periods.
However, the longer running volume in HYROX — and the sustained engine demands across multiple zones in DEKA — can reveal gaps. Athletes who are used to shorter, more explosive workouts may find it challenging to hold a steady, controlled effort without fading later.
A fair discussion point is whether CrossFitters sometimes gain time on the stations but give some of it back on the runs, especially if early pacing is too aggressive.

OCR Racers: Built for the Engine
OCR athletes, including many who’ve raced in events like Spartan Race, arrive with a different set of strengths. Their training and racing backgrounds often emphasize long efforts, compromised running, and carrying loads over distance.
OCR experience typically develops:
-
A deep aerobic base
-
Durability when running on tired legs
-
Mental patience over longer race durations
Those traits can make the repeated 1 km runs in HYROX feel more manageable and help with steady pacing across both HYROX and DEKA formats. OCR athletes are often comfortable settling into a sustainable rhythm and resisting the urge to surge too early.
On the other hand, HYROX includes heavier, more standardized gym-based strength demands than many obstacle races. Sled pushes and pulls are performed with set loads, and high-repetition wall balls can become a major limiter if upper-body and leg strength endurance haven’t been priorities in training. There’s also a technical learning curve with machines like the SkiErg and rower, where efficiency can make a meaningful difference over race distance.
This leads to another strong debate angle: do OCR racers often hold steadier splits on the runs but lose time on the heaviest stations?
Dr. Nic Cartaya (PT and HYROX & OCR Performance Coach) described his experience of coming from both OCR and CrossFit backgrounds this way:
“I started running for obstacle course racing, so that never changed, but I transitioned from weightlifting to CrossFit, which has really helped me with the higher-intensity work of HYROX and DEKA…
Running has been the most natural part for me… it’s a great way to use as recovery in between stations to refresh and get my mind straight again.
I was surprised by how much more strength and endurance I needed… I had the worst quad cramping I’ve ever experienced during the lunges. It was horrible.
I’ve switched my running from mostly slow and easy to incorporating a lot more speed work… now it’s a lot more fun, and I get more out of my runs.”
Where the Race Is Really Won (or Lost)
When you zoom out, the contrast between backgrounds becomes clearer:
-
CrossFit-style athletes often feel stronger and more confident on the gym-based stations
-
OCR-style athletes often feel more comfortable with the repeated running and longer pacing demands
-
Both groups are used to working under fatigue, just in slightly different ways
HYROX rarely rewards someone who is excellent at only one side of the equation. Instead, it tends to favor athletes who’ve worked hard to bring up their weaker areas — turning a strength specialist into a better runner, or an endurance athlete into a more capable strength performer.
The Take That Might Stir Debate
One balanced way to frame it is this:
CrossFitters often gain time in the functional strength sections. OCR racers often gain time during longer aerobic efforts. In HYROX and DEKA alike, outcomes are often decided by who is least limited by their weaker side.
That’s why finish times can be surprisingly close between athletes with very different training histories — and why race experiences can feel so different even when the clock says otherwise.
As the Sports Grow, Will Background Matter Less?
As HYROX and DEKA continue to grow, more athletes are beginning to train specifically for these hybrid formats rather than coming in primarily from another sport. Over time, we may see more competitors who aren’t “former CrossFitters” or “former OCR racers,” but simply dedicated hybrid racing athletes training year-round for this exact blend of running, engine work, and functional strength.
If that happens, the conversation may shift from where you started to how well you adapted your training to the format.
Kelly Sullivan, a hybrid athlete with a long background in OCR, CrossFit and a MudGear Ambassador, explained how her training has evolved:
“I’ve done OCR for 16 years and CrossFit for 13, but I’ve competed more in OCR. I think that balance helped me shift into hybrid racing more seamlessly…
Before focusing on DEKA and HYROX, my training was mostly running and CrossFit. I was already proficient with obstacles, so I didn’t really need to specialize there — my grip work in CrossFit was enough… Nothing about DEKA or HYROX really surprised me. I related it most to CrossFit, and that helped a lot when I started.
Since shifting my focus to DEKA and HYROX, my training has become much more specific. I still CrossFit when I can, but now I work with Underdog to tailor my training for these races. I do more running intervals, more erg work, and more compromised running workouts that mimic the stations I’ll see in competition.”
In the end, there may never be a single “perfect” background for HYROX or DEKA — and that’s part of what makes the sport so interesting to watch and race. Some athletes feel strongest on the stations, others come alive on the runs, and most discover at least one surprise weakness along the way.
What’s been your experience? Did your training background help more with strength or endurance? And if you’ve adjusted your training specifically for HYROX/DEKA, what made the biggest difference? Sharing those lessons might help the next athlete toe the start line a little better prepared. Leave a comment to share your story or perspective.
In a building with equipment and scheduled activities, often repeated, with relatively short bursts of intensity = Crossfit. Anything related to this dynamic is very well suited for them. Real world out of the box activities, with dirt and hills and that unique flavor of awkwardness (and a cold dunk wall) for more than just an hour (sometimes 3-5+ hrs) is a different story, and well suited for OCR. I love both…
Leave a comment